Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Indian J Radiol Imaging ; 33(3): 351-360, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2328310

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a multisystemic disease and involvement of the nervous system is well established. The neurological and neuroimaging features of the disease have been extensively evaluated. Our study aimed to elucidate the neuroradiological findings in COVID-19 infected patients admitted to our institute during the first and second waves of the pandemic in India. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of all COVID-19 positive patients who underwent neuroimaging between March 2020 and May 2021. The presenting neurological complaints, the imaging findings in computed tomography (CT) imaging, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recorded. They recorded the findings in the subheadings of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, parainfectious demyelination, acute encephalitis syndrome, and changes of global hypoxic changes. Patients with age-related, chronic, and incidental findings were excluded. Results The study comprised of 180 COVID-19 positive patients who underwent neuroimaging. CT scan was performed for 169 patients, MRI for 28, and a combination of both CT and MRI was performed for 17 patients. Seventy percent of patients were males, and median age was 61.5 years (interquartile range: 48.25-70.75). Out of the 180 patients, 66 patients had nonspecific findings that could not be attributed to COVID-19 infection. In the remaining 114 patients, 77 (42.7%) had ischemic findings, while 22 (12.2%) had hemorrhagic stroke. Hypoxic ischemic changes were noted in five patients. The rest of the patients had a spectrum of changes including, cerebellitis (3), tumefactive demyelination (1), COVID-19-associated encephalitis (1), hemorrhagic acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (1), transverse myelitis (1), cytotoxic lesions of corpus callosum (1), Guillain-Barre syndrome (1), and COVID-19-associated microhemorrhages (1). Conclusion Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection are not uncommon, and our understanding of this topic is expanding. A complex interplay of neurotropism and direct central nervous system invasion, immune activation and cytokine storm, vasculitis, and parainfectious processes are implicated in the pathophysiology. While the most common imaging finding was ischemic stroke, followed by hemorrhagic stroke, a diverse range of parainfectious findings was also noted in our study.

2.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther ; 53(5): 418-428, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326227

ABSTRACT

Tracheostomy is a standard surgical procedure that is used in critically ill patients who require sustained mechanical ventilation. In this article, we review the outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who underwent tracheostomy. We searched for relevant articles on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, up to April 20, 2021. This meta- analysis examines ventilation liberation, decannulation, and hospital mortality rates in COVID-19 patients who have undergone tracheostomy. Two investigators evaluated the articles, and the differences of opinion were settled by consensus with a third author. A total of 4366 patients were included in 47 related articles for this meta-analysis. After data pooling, the proportions of ventilation liberation, decannulation and mortality were found to be 48% (95% CI: 31-64), 42% (95% CI: 17-69) and 18% (95% CI: 9-28) respectively. The Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index values for ventilation liberation, decannulation and mortality were 4.28, 1.32 and 0.69. No transmission of the disease attributable to participating in tracheostomy procedures was reported in most of the included articles.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Illness , Humans , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheostomy
3.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; : 1-8, 2023 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2254409

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Covid 19 epidemic has affected the people making them undergo emergency procedures requiring intubation. A protective box was innovated at our tertiary care centre to safeguard the HCW during intubation and/or extubation and the study was planned to assess its use and safety among the anaesthesiologists. Methods: A cross sectional, questionnaire base survey was done among anaesthesiologists in various strata of residency. The intubation box was used on the patient for intubation and extubation. The experience of participants was recorded via a Google Form and one response per participant was restricted. Participants were divided into two groups, Group 1(1stand 2nd year junior residents) and Group 2 (Senior resident and 3rd year junior resident). A valid response, was received from 25 anaesthesiologists who were either performing or assisting the intubation. The residents were evaluated based on the ease of use and safety features of the box. Results: There was a significant difference in the time taken to intubate between the two groups (p = 0.048) and it was found that Group 2 with more experience took less time to intubate than Group 1. Also, more respondents in Group 2 found it easier to manoeuvre the hands to handle instruments than Group 1(p = 0.024). Conclusion: We recommend that usage of intubation box during intubation or extubation is a non-harmful and necessary compromise that we must make to protect the /safeguard the well-being of Health Care Worker without affecting patient care in our fight with COVID-19. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03692-7.

4.
Biol Trace Elem Res ; 2022 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244400

ABSTRACT

The deficiencies of trace elements and infectious diseases often coexist and exhibit complex interactions. Several trace elements such as zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and magnesium (Mg) have immunomodulatory functions and thus influence the susceptibility to the course and outcome of a variety of viral infections. So, this present study was aimed to study relations of trace metals in association with severity and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 patients. A total of 150 individuals infected with COVID-19 and 50 healthy individuals were recruited. Cases were divided based on severity (mild, moderate and severe) and outcome (discharged or deceased). Serum Zn, Mg and Cu levels were analysed by direct colourimetric method. Both serum Cu and Zn levels were significantly decreased in cases when compared to those in controls (p < 0.005 and p < 0.0001). Serum magnesium levels although not significant were found to be slightly decreased in controls. On comparing the trace elements between the deceased and discharged cases, a significant difference was found between serum copper and zinc levels, but for magnesium, both groups have similar levels. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve results indicate that a serum Cu/Zn ratio along with the age of patient provides some reliable information on COVID-19 course and survival odds by yielding an AUC of 95.1% with a sensitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 89.8%. Therefore, we would like to emphasize that measuring the serum copper and zinc along with their ratio can be used as routine investigations for COVID-19 patients in proper identification and management of severe cases in upcoming new waves of COVID-19.

5.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31932, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2203350

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality across the world. The prognosis was found to be poor in patients with co-morbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, interstitial lung disease, etc. Although biochemical studies were done in patient samples, no study has been reported from the Indian subcontinent about ultrastructural changes in the vital organs of COVID-19 patients. The present study was, therefore, conducted to understand the ultrastructural changes in the lung, liver, and brain of the deceased patients. METHODS: The present study was conducted on samples obtained from reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive patients who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Western India. Core needle biopsies were done in eight fatal cases of COVID-19. The samples were taken from the lungs, liver, and brain and subjected to light microscopy, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Clinical details and biochemical findings were also collected.  Results: The study participants included seven males and one female. The presenting complaints included fever, breathlessness, and cough. Light microscopy revealed diffuse alveolar damage in the lungs. Further, a positive expression of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein was observed in the pulmonary parenchyma of five patients. Also, the TEM microphotograph showed viral particles of size up to 80nm localized in alveolar epithelial cells. However, no viral particles were found in liver or brain samples. In the liver, macrovesicular steatosis and centrizonal congestion with loss of hepatocytes were observed in light microscopy. CONCLUSION:  This is the first study in the Indian population showing the in-situ presence of viral particles in core biopsies from fatal cases of COVID-19. As evident from the results, histology and ultrastructural changes in the lung correlated with the presence of viral particles. The study revealed a positive correlation between the damage in the lungs and the presence of viral particles.

6.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30608, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2124088

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS -CoV-2 was first reported in Wuhan and declared a pandemic in March 2020. Co-infections during other pandemics have been associated with severe outcomes, but data are scarce regarding co-infections in COVID-19 patients. Our study evaluated co-infections prevalence and its impact on morbidity and mortality in hospitalized COVID -19 patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 100 patients admitted to a high-dependency unit at a tertiary care hospital in India. Prevalence of co-infections and clinical outcome-related data were analyzed in COVID-19 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: 14% of patients had co-infections, out of which urinary tract infection was found in 9%. Patients with co-infections had a higher mortality rate (p<0.0004). Urinary co-infection emerged as an independent risk factor for mortality (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: Co-infections associated with COVID-19 infections are an essential risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Early identification and timely treatment of co-infections may help in improving clinical outcomes.

7.
J Trace Elem Med Biol ; 74: 127075, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nutritional deficiency is associated with weaken immune system and increased susceptibility to infection. Among other nutrients, several trace elements have been shown to regulate immune responses. Iron is one of the most abundant trace elements present in our body, which is required in various biological processes. Iron has an immunomodulatory function and thus influence the susceptibility to the course and outcome of a variety of viral infections. So, this present study was aimed to study relations of different iron-related biomarkers in association to severity and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 individuals infected with COVID-19 and 50 healthy individuals were recruited. Cases were divided based on severity (mild, moderate, and severe) and outcome (discharged or deceased). Serum iron, TIBC, ferritin, transferrin, transferrin saturation levels were analyzed by the direct colourimetric method. RESULTS: In cases the median levels of serum iron, TIBC, transferrin, transferrin saturation and ferritin are 29 µg/dL, 132.53 µg/dL, 106.3 mg/dL, 17.74 % and 702.9 ng/dL respectively. Similarly, in controls the median levels of serum iron, TIBC, transferrin, transferrin saturation and ferritin are 53 µg/dL, 391.88 µg/dL, 313.51 mg/dL, 12.81 % and 13.52 ng/dL respectively. On comparing the cases with the controls, a significant lower level of iron, TIBC, and transferrin were found in the cases along with the significant higher levels of ferritin and transferrin saturation. On comparing the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of Iron, Ferritin, Transferrin, Transferrin sat % and TIBC in relation to survival in COVID-19 patients it was found that iron, followed by transferrin and ferritin has the highest area under the curve (AUC) with 74 %, 63 % and 61 % respectively. Further, in pairwise analysis of ROC curve, a significant difference was found between the Iron-transferrin (p < 0.01), iron-TIBC (p < 0.001) and transferrin-ferritin (P < 0.01). The multiple regression model based on Iron and transferrin outperformed any other combination of variables via stepwise AIC selection with an AUC of 98.2 %. The cutoff point according to Youden's J index is characterized with a sensitivity of 98 % and a specificity of 96.8 %, indicating that iron along with transferrin can be a useful marker that may contribute to a better assessment of survival chances in COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a significantly decreased levels of iron, TIBC, & transferrin and a significantly increased levels of ferritin and transferrin saturation in COVID-19 patients when compared with controls. Further, Iron and transferrin were observed to be a good predictor of mortality in patients with COVID-19. From the above analysis we confirm that iron-related biomarkers play an important role in the development of oxidative stress and further lead to activation of the cytokine storm. So, continuous monitoring of these parameters could be helpful in the early detection of individuals developing the severe disease and can be used to decrease mortality in upcoming new waves of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Trace Elements , Biomarkers , Ferritins , Humans , Iron/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Transferrin
8.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 38(Suppl 1): S138-S139, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2024791
9.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 38(Suppl 1): S89-S95, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2024774

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: The hypercoagulability occurring in COVID-19 patients is detected only by Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). However, the benefit of performing ROTEM in the management of disease and predicting the outcome of COVID-19 patients is yet to be established. Material and Methods: The data of 23 critically ill and 11 stable COVID-19 adult patients were extracted from the hospital information system admitted between July and August 2020 and patient charts and analyzed retrospectively. The critically ill patients were divided as a survivor and non-survivor groups. The Intrinsic pathway part of ROTEM (INTEM) and Fibrinogen part of ROTEM (FIBTEM) were performed on day 0 for both critically ill and stable patients, and on day 10 for critically ill patients. The statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 26 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The median FIBTEM amplitude at 5 min (A5) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) were elevated in both stable and critically ill patients (24 vs 27 mm, P = 0.46 and 27.5 vs 40 mm, P = 0.011) with a significant difference in FIBTEM MCF. But there was no significant difference between number of survivors and non-survivors with FIBTEM MCF >25 at day 0 and day 10. Conclusion: The Hypercoagulability state as detected by ROTEM parameters at day 0 and day 10 had no association with the outcome (mortality) of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Hence it cannot be used as a prognostic test. The increasing age, comorbidities and D-dimer values were associated with a poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

10.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 38(Suppl 1): S58-S65, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2024763

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-related stress is an important but under-rated issue needing attention. Stress and causative factors vary between the regions and individuals depending on the availability of resources, socio-cultural differences, and individual perceptions. We aimed to study the psychosocial impact and coping strategies among the healthcare workers (HCWs) in Western Rajasthan during COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: This questionnaire-based observational study, consisting of 59 questions in 6 sections, was conducted to identify stress, causative factors, coping strategies, and experiences of HCWs working in personal protective equipment (PPE). Chi-square test was used to compare the responses between different subgroups. Results: Majority of the HCWs felt responsible for treating COVID-19 patients (98.8%), but also felt that it was affecting their safety (81.4%). On subgroup analysis, doctors were found to be more stressed than nursing staff (P = 0.004). Major stressors included concerns about infecting family members and lack of specific treatment for COVID-19 (87.5%). Family support was found to be a major stress-relieving factor (97.3%). Most HCWs suggested that comfortable quarantine stay, adequate supply of PPE, and equipments would help in reducing stress. Conclusion: Frontline HCWs in Western Rajasthan were under significant stress during COVID-19 pandemic. We found that stress-causing factors and coping strategies varied between different subgroups based on profession, gender, and age. We recommend conducting such studies in different regions of the world to develop relevant and region-specific strategies to help HCWs cope with stress more efficiently, thereby, strengthening the healthcare system to deal with future pandemics.

11.
Infect Disord Drug Targets ; 22(5): 77-84, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1809166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The higher mortality rate in COVID-19 patients is still a concern. Though some studies mention that elderly patients with co-morbidities are at higher risk of mortality, some others report uneventful outcomes in young patients even without co-morbidities. Secondary bacterial and fungal infections, especially with nosocomial pathogens are known to be associated with worse outcome in the ongoing pandemic as well as in the previous viral outbreaks. In such a scenario, the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients can be improved by timely identification of secondary infections using appropriate biomarkers and by following appropriate infection control measures to prevent the spread of nosocomial pathogens. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to find out the prevalence of bloodstream infections (BSI) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to analyze their laboratory markers and outcome by comparing them with those without BSI. METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, the prevalence of secondary BSI was determined among the hospitalized COVID-19 patients by including 388 blood culture bottles collected from 293 patients, which were received in the microbiology lab within the study period. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of BSI in COVID-19 patients was 39.5% (116/293), out of which 35.5% (104/293) infections were bacterial, and 4.1% (12/293) were fungal, while 8.9% (26/293) patients grew contaminants, and 51.5% (151/293) were sterile. Common causative agents of secondary BSI were found to be MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.9%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.8%) followed by Candida species (4.1%). Patients with co-morbidities like diabetes, hypertension and COPD were at higher risk of developing BSI with significantly higher levels of sepsis markers such as Creactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, ferritin and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). The mortality rate was significantly higher (60.2%) in patients with BSI compared to the group of patients without BSI. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the necessity of early diagnosis of the secondary infections using appropriate biomarkers and following proper infection control measures to prevent the spread of the nosocomial infections and improve the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Cross Infection , Sepsis , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteria , Biomarkers , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
12.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 70(4): 11-12, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1801253

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a highly infectious disease with varied presentation as well as outcome. Inflammation plays a major role in the outcome of COVID-19 infection. This study was aimed to evaluate the role of conventional feasible inflammatory markers in predicting the outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized adult patients. MATERIAL: A total of 100 confirmed COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Biochemical, hematological, and inflammatory markers were assessed in all the patients. Disease severity and primary outcome as survival and or mortality were recorded. OBSERVATION: Hematological indices and inflammatory markers were significantly higher among the non-survivor. N/L (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte) ratio and CRP (C-reactive protein) can differentiate non-survivor from survivors with the sensitivity of 85.7%, 85.7%, and specificity of 96.8 %, 77.4% with a cut-off value of 6.44, 23.02 respectively in the receiver operator curve (ROC). N/L ratio and CRP were significantly increased among the patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Cox regression Survival analysis showed that an elevated N/L ratio and CRP were significantly associated with mortality with the Hazard ratio of 1.331 (P <0.001) and 1.014 (P <0.015) respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study implicates that increased N/L ratio and CRP were significantly correlated with severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. These conventional feasible markers can be useful in predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
13.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 12(2): 390-397, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1751085

ABSTRACT

AIM: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak resulted in severe health impact with the loss of many lives across the world. Pulmonary parenchyma suffers the most from the brunt of the infection. However, evidence suggested a systemic involvement during the course of illness. Information on morphological changes of the liver is sparse in the literature. We aimed to evaluate the pathological findings in the liver by minimally invasive autopsies. METHODS: Postmortem core biopsies of the liver obtained from patients who succumbed to coronavirus disease 2019 disease were studied. Demographic findings, comorbidities, and relevant laboratory tests were collected. Detailed histopathological changes were assessed. RESULTS: Liver function tests were available in 40 cases, and it was deranged in 80% cases. A spectrum of histological changes was observed. Macrovesicular steatosis and nonspecific portal inflammation of mild degree were the common morphological changes. Features suggestive of vascular alteration were noted in more than half of the cases. These included increased portal vein branches, irregular luminal dilation, and herniation of portal veins into the periportal hepatocytes. In addition, we observed morphological changes attributed to terminal shock-related changes. CONCLUSION: The present study results highlight that liver parenchyma changes may be related to multiple pathogenic mechanisms. The presence of vascular alteration in portal tracts suggests derangement of hepatic vasculature related to systemic hypercoagulable state induced by the viral infection. It remains to be established if the histological changes are related to direct viral insult or to the systemic response caused by the viral attack.

14.
Adv Respir Med ; 2022 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1705404

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Health care workers (HCWs) are directly involved in processes linked with diagnosis, management, and assistance of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients which could have direct implications on their physical and emotional health. Emotional aspects of working in an infectious pandemic situation is often neglected in favour of the more obvious physical ramifications. This single point assessment study aimed to explore the factors related to stress, anxiety and depression among HCWs consequent to working in a pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving healthcare workers who were working in COVID-19 inpatient ward, COVID-19 screening area, suspect ward, suspect intensive care unit (ICU) and COVID-19 ICU across four hospitals in India. A web-based survey questionnaire was designed to elicit responses to daily challenges faced by HCWs. The questionnaire was regressed using machine-learning algorithm (Cat Boost) against the standardized Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 (DASS 21) which was used to quantify emotional distress experienced by them. RESULTS: A total of 156 participants were included in this study. As per DASS-21 scoring, severe stress was seen in ∼17% of respondents. We could achieve an R² of 0.28 using our machine-learning model. The major factors responsible for stress were decreased time available for personal needs, increasing age, being posted out of core area of expertise, setting of COVID-19 care, increasing duty hours, increasing duty days, marital status and being a resident physician. CONCLUSIONS: Factors elicited in this study that are associated with stress in HCWs need to be addressed to provide wholesome emotional support to HCWs battling the pandemic. Targeted interventions may result in increased emotional resilience of the health-care system.

15.
J Mycol Med ; 32(2): 101238, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1586952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with ROCM (Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis) following their medical and surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a prognostic study based in a tertiary care center in North-Western India. Patients who developed ROCM post COVID-19 infection from 1st September 2020 to 30th June 2021 were included in this study. Surgical debridement and administration of antifungal therapy was done for the post-COVID-19 ROCM patients. Disease progression and survival was studied up to 5 months of follow-up in the second wave. RESULTS: A total of 145 ROCM patients were included. The mean age at presentation, male: female ratio was 48.2 years and 2:1 respectively. As per our proposed new staging system and treatment strategy, the majority of patients belonged to stage II (31.72%) and stage III (31.03%). On a follow-up period of 5 months, 26 (18%) patients have lost their life and rest of the patients are on strict follow-up. CONCLUSION: ROCM is an extremely aggressive fungal infection which rapidly became an epidemic following the COVID-19 pandemic. The diverse and unique presentation led us to evolve a new strategy to classify and manage these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Eye Infections, Fungal , Mucormycosis , Orbital Diseases , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Mucormycosis/drug therapy , Mucormycosis/epidemiology , Mucormycosis/surgery , Orbital Diseases/drug therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers
16.
Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets ; 21(3): 185-195, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1547080

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The understanding of pathogenesis is necessary for the development of effective treatment for COVID-19. Various studies have postulated that there is a complex interplay of mediators of coagulation and inflammation responsible for the pathogenesis of COVID-19. We did this study on coagulation parameters and inflammatory markers and their effect on outcome in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a single centre observational cross-sectional study. Procoagulants [Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, lupus anticoagulant (LA), fibrinogen, factor-VIII (F-VIII)]; anticoagulants [protein-C (PC), protein-S (PS), antithrombin] and inflammatory markers [interleukin-6 (IL-6) and highly sensitive - C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] were measured at the time of hospitalization and correlated with the severity of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were enrolled, of which 61.3%, 20.0%, and 18.7% had asymptomatic/ mild, moderate, or severe disease, respectively. COVID-19 disease severity was associated with rising trends with coagulation parameters (PT, APTT, D-Dimer; p value 0.01, <0.0001, <0.0001, respectively). Falling trends of anticoagulant (PC, Antithrombin; p value <0.0001, 0.003 respectively) and rising trends of procoagulant (fibrinogen, F-VIII; p value 0.004, <0.0001 respectively) were observed with increasing COVID-19 disease severity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that advanced age, high D-Dimer, and high hs-CRP (p value 0.035, 0.018, <0.0001 respectively) were independent predictors of mortality in COVID-19. Procoagulant parameters (D-dimer, APTT, Factor VIII) were positively correlated with anticoagulant parameters (PC and PS) and inflammatory parameters (hs-CRP). CONCLUSION: This study revealed increased levels of coagulation and inflammatory parameters, which correlated with the severity of COVID-19. Age, D-dimer, IL-6, hs-CRP, APTT, fibrinogen, and Factor VIII were significantly higher in patients with moderate and severe disease as compared to asymptomatic/mild disease. Advanced age, high D-dimer, and high hs-CRP were significantly associated with poor outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Blood Coagulation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers
17.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 10(9): 3240-3246, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1478272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) issued guidelines that all patients presenting with severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) should be investigated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Following the same protocol, in our institute, all patients with SARI were transferred to the COVID-19 suspect intensive care unit (ICU) and investigated for COVID-19. METHODS: This study was planned to examine the demographical, clinical features, and outcomes of the first 500 suspected patients of COVID-19 with SARI admitted in the COVID-19 suspect ICU at a tertiary care center. Between March 7 and July 20, 2020, 500 patients were admitted to the COVID-19 suspect ICU. We analyzed the demographical, clinical features, and outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative SARI cases. The records of all the patients were reviewed until July 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 500 suspected patients admitted to the hospital, 88 patients showed positive results for COVID-19 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of the nasopharyngeal swabs. The mean age in the positive group was higher (55.31 ± 16.16 years) than in the negative group (40.46 ± 17.49 years) (P < 0.001). Forty-seven (53.4%) of these patients in the COVID-19 positive group and 217 (52.7%) from the negative group suffered from previously known comorbidities. The common symptoms included fever, cough, sore throat, and dyspnea. Eighty-five (20.6%) patients died in the COVID-19 negative group, and 30 (34.1%) died in the COVID-19 positive group (P = 0.006). Deaths among the COVID-19 positive group had a significantly higher age than deaths in the COVID-19 negative group (P < 0.001). Among the patients who died with positive COVID-19 status had substantially higher neutrophilia and lymphopenia (P < 0.001). X-ray chest abnormalities were almost three times more likely in COVID-19 deaths (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the present article, 17.6% of SARI were due to COVID-19 infection with significantly higher mortality (34.1%) in COVID-19 positive patients with SARI. Although all patients presenting as SARI have considerable mortality rates, the COVID-19-associated SARI cases thus had an almost one-third risk of mortality.

18.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 25(10): 1193-1196, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1468641

ABSTRACT

Rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis is an invasive fungal infection associated with mortality of 25-62%. There has been a surge in the number of cases during this second wave of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in India. We report 10 cases of mucormycosis admitted to our adult intensive care unit. After reviewing the patient's information, we found that 60% of patients had received steroids, and most had uncontrolled blood sugar levels. Most patients received treatment with surgical debridement and antifungal, although the mortality rate was as high as 40%. We report two unique cases of renal and gastrointestinal mucormycosis as well. We concluded that poor glycemic control was the primary etiology behind the rise in the number of cases. Our report also stresses the importance of early surgical intervention and suggests further research comparing the efficacy of combination antifungal therapy versus single antifungal (amphotericin B) to help resource-limited settings in these times of drug crisis. How to cite this article: Yadav S, Sharma A, Kothari N, Bhatia PK, Goyal S, Goyal A. Mucormycosis: A Case Series of Patients Admitted in Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Center during the Second Wave. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1193-1196.

19.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus ; 38(2): 416-421, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1437330

ABSTRACT

The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originated in Wuhan City of China. In India, first confirmed case of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was reported on January 30, 2020 and India is presently hit by second wave of COVID-19. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone marrow findings of COVID-19 by minimally invasive autopsies to aid in understanding pathophysiology of the disease. This prospective study was conducted at tertiary care centre of Western Rajasthan. After obtaining approval from Institute's ethics committee and consent from next of kins, minimally invasive autopsies were conducted in 37 COVID-19 deceased patients within an hour after the death. The tissue specimens were processed with standard biosafety measures. Electronic medical records were reviewed retrospectively and patients' clinical details and results of laboratory investigations were noted. In this prospective study, bone marrow biopsies were collected from 37 COVID-19 minimally invasive autopsies. Mean age of these cases was 61.8 years and male: female ratio was 2.36. Comorbidities were observed in 25 (67.5%) of all cases. Histopathological analysis revealed hypercellular, normocellular and hypocellular marrow in 5, 25 and 5 cases respectively (two biopsies were inadequate). There was marked interstitial prominence of histiocytes in 24 (68.5%) cases. Out of these, evidence of haemophagocytosis was observed in 14 (40%) cases, marked increase of haemosiderin laden macrophages in 20 (57.1%) cases. There was prominence of plasma cells in 28 (80%) cases. The present study attempted to fill the gap of dearth of literature from our country in COVID-19 autopsy studies by highlighting bone marrow findings. The data support the evidence of development of secondary haemophagocytic lymphocytosis in COVID-19 cases.

20.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 933, 2021 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an emerging cause of significant morbidity and mortality in severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical profile and outcome of BSIs in critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Western India. All patients (age > 18 years) with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed COVID-19 admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Hospital electronic records were searched for demographic data, time of bloodstream infection since admission, clinical profile, antimicrobial resistance pattern and clinical outcome of all patients who developed BSIs. RESULTS: Out of 750 patients admitted in COVID ICU, 8.5% developed secondary BSIs. All severe COVID-19 patients who developed BSIs succumbed to illness. A significant proportion of BSIs were Gram-negative pathogens (53/64, 82.8%). Acinetobacter baumannii was the commonest isolate, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (32.8% and 21.9%, respectively). Multidrug-resistance organisms (MDRO) were found in 57.8% of the cases. The majority of MDRO belonged to K. pneumoniae and Enterococcus groups. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenems was 47.2% (25/53). On multivariate analysis, raised total leukocyte counts, mechanical ventilation and presence of comorbidities were significantly associated with the incidence of BSIs. CONCLUSION: We found a significant prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii in COVID-19 associated BSIs. The presence of comorbidities raised leukocyte counts and mechanical ventilation should alarm clinicians for possible BSIs. The timely initiation of empirical antibiotics and rapid de-escalation is vital to improve the outcome. At the same time, strict compliance of infection control practices should be accomplished to reduce the occurrence of MDRO.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Sepsis , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL